jadensababe505 jadensababe505
  • 22-05-2018
  • Social Studies
contestada

When warning users about the dangers of products, writers should avoid using mandatory language such as must and shall?

Respuesta :

andriansp andriansp
  • 31-05-2018
I believe the answer is: False

Mandatory language is actually advisable to be used in this situation.
Using mandatory language would set a clear limitation that make the consumers understand the magnitude of the danger. This would make them much more likely to follow the written warning.
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Can someone write down three facts that you believe to be undeniable truths
Where is the greatest volume of blood found in the body?
Why was terraced farming such an important development for the Chavin and later Andean cultures?
Water molecules can pass into a cell, while larger molecules cannot. Which feature of a cell allows this to be true?
CO2(g)+H2(g)---->CO(g)+H2O(l) what i being oxidized
what is the approximate result of converting 7 kilograms into pounds? Remember that 1 kilogram = 2.2 pounds
A group of organ systems that work together make up a(n) tissue organism organ cell
Jay’s Nursery sells border plants for home gardeners at a discounted price of $12.99. Jay’s has 335 plants it must sell. Fixed costs for all these plants were $
The pressure of 1 mol of gas is decreased to 0.5 atm at 273 K. What happens to the molar volume of the gas under these conditions? The molar volume is halved. T
EFGH is a kite. To prove that the diagonals of a kite are perpendicular, which pair of angles must you prove congruent using CPCTC?